Nice overview and clear presentation.
Good talk; the discussion on overall response to therapy INRC was quite poor; The table for staging and response were tiny
syllabus was not made available to on line participants - this was the only major drawback to purchasing access to this course
Overall good talk.
extremely thorough lecture.
Interesting and thorough
NBL is always a challenging diagnosis to encompass, but overall I thought it was effective.
Some of the figures were very difficult to see. Pretty much just put a bunch of figures and graphs together and sad to memorize them, will have to go back and look up the figures myself in the papers which was annoying.
Great review of neuroblastoma, also liked how lecturer incorporated the clinical trial/data to support the current standard of care.
Effective for the talk, but I find it challenging when we just skipped over the response criteria (it would be great to have a "this is the general theme of this chart" statement so as to be able to draw some generalities, and then note the exceptions on our own). Overall a solid talk, thank you.
Good lecture - would take out anything not boards pertinent
Excellent presentation - Q&A section was difficult because moderator didn't allow presenter to answer questions.
This lecture could improve if the speaker provided more direction on what to focus on. I found it difficult to understand what level of detail or any pearls that would be on the boards. We aren't going to hold anything against the speaker after the boards, we understand she can't predict the boards questions- we just wanted to know what her best guess is in what is high yield for the boards. Answers like "know everything on the charts in the slides" are not as helpful.
Nice review
Dose response charts should have put into perspective, unrealistic to know all responses / all staging for the boards.
Appreciated the focus on classification systems.
dense lecture
Content was dry, and teaching style did not adhere to any tenants of adult learning theory i.e., no active learning elements like test questions, slides were dense and not attractive/easy to read.
Well-organized lecture! One consideration - I think it would have been helpful to distill down some of the staging/classification type information into the most salient points in order to make it easier to assimilate/remember.
needs to improve in question answering- color coding would be very helpful
Comprehensive presentation but lost a little focus on what info actually needed for boards.
good, clear, boards focused
slides were very busy